Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bautista v. City of Glendale, CV 18-740-FMO (KS). (2020)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20200302661 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 28, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2020
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the operative complaint, the parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment and related briefing, all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (the "Report"), and Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report ("Objections"). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C) and Federa
More

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative complaint, the parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment and related briefing, all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (the "Report"), and Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report ("Objections"). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer