Whitaker v. La Goccia, Inc., CV 19-10123 PA (RAOx). (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200305959
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . In accordance with the Court's December 16, 2019, and March 3, 2020 Minute Orders, which dismissed the federal claim asserted by plaintiff Brian Whitaker ("Plaintiff") against defendant La Goccia, Inc. ("Defendant") for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as a result of Plaintiff's lack of standing and the mootness of his federal claim, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claim contained in Plaintiff's
Summary: JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . In accordance with the Court's December 16, 2019, and March 3, 2020 Minute Orders, which dismissed the federal claim asserted by plaintiff Brian Whitaker ("Plaintiff") against defendant La Goccia, Inc. ("Defendant") for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as a result of Plaintiff's lack of standing and the mootness of his federal claim, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claim contained in Plaintiff's ..
More
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.
In accordance with the Court's December 16, 2019, and March 3, 2020 Minute Orders, which dismissed the federal claim asserted by plaintiff Brian Whitaker ("Plaintiff") against defendant La Goccia, Inc. ("Defendant") for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as a result of Plaintiff's lack of standing and the mootness of his federal claim, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claim contained in Plaintiff's Complaint, it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that each of Plaintiff's claims are dismissed without prejudice.
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall have its costs of suit.
Source: Leagle
