Ramirez v. County of Riverside, 5:20-cv-00369-JFW-KK. (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200306a66
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2020
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS' FEDERAL CLAIM AND REMANDING ACTION TO SUPERIOR COURT OF RIVERSIDE JOHN F. WALTER , District Judge . Pursuant to the stipulation of all parties, and good cause having been shown, the Court hereby orders as follows: 1. Plaintiffs ANGEL RAMIREZ and ALBERTO RAMIREZ's ("Plaintiffs") sixth cause of action for violation of 42 U.S.C. 1983 is dismissed as to all defendants, including defendant COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (the "County"); 2. Plaintiffs and the Cou
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS' FEDERAL CLAIM AND REMANDING ACTION TO SUPERIOR COURT OF RIVERSIDE JOHN F. WALTER , District Judge . Pursuant to the stipulation of all parties, and good cause having been shown, the Court hereby orders as follows: 1. Plaintiffs ANGEL RAMIREZ and ALBERTO RAMIREZ's ("Plaintiffs") sixth cause of action for violation of 42 U.S.C. 1983 is dismissed as to all defendants, including defendant COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (the "County"); 2. Plaintiffs and the Coun..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS' FEDERAL CLAIM AND REMANDING ACTION TO SUPERIOR COURT OF RIVERSIDE
JOHN F. WALTER, District Judge.
Pursuant to the stipulation of all parties, and good cause having been shown, the Court hereby orders as follows:
1. Plaintiffs ANGEL RAMIREZ and ALBERTO RAMIREZ's ("Plaintiffs") sixth cause of action for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is dismissed as to all defendants, including defendant COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (the "County");
2. Plaintiffs and the County will bear their own attorneys' fees and costs as to Plaintiffs' claim for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, with no party determined to be the prevailing party as to that claim; and
3. This action in its entirety is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside forthwith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
