Baxter v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 8:19-cv-01747 JLS (JDEx). (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200312886
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 09, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2020
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. JOSEPHINE L. STATON , District Judge . Plaintiff Mindy Baxter and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. have announced to the Court that all matters in controversy against Experian Information Solutions, Inc. have been resolved. A Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice of Experian Information Solutions, Inc. has been signed and filed with the Court. Having considered the Stipulation of Dismissal
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. JOSEPHINE L. STATON , District Judge . Plaintiff Mindy Baxter and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. have announced to the Court that all matters in controversy against Experian Information Solutions, Inc. have been resolved. A Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice of Experian Information Solutions, Inc. has been signed and filed with the Court. Having considered the Stipulation of Dismissal ..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
JOSEPHINE L. STATON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mindy Baxter and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. have announced to the Court that all matters in controversy against Experian Information Solutions, Inc. have been resolved. A Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice of Experian Information Solutions, Inc. has been signed and filed with the Court. Having considered the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice of Experian Information Solutions, Inc., the Court makes and delivers the following ruling:
IT IS ORDERED that the claims and causes of action that were or could have been asserted herein by Plaintiff Mindy Baxter against Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. are in all respects dismissed with prejudice to the refiling of same, with court costs to be paid by the party incurring same.
Source: Leagle
