Young v. John, 2:17-cv-06426-RGK (JDE). (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200316992
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2020
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . Based on the Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal entered by and between Plaintiff and Defendant (Dkt. 80, "the Stipulation") and for good cause shown: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Stipulation is approved; 2. Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose , 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and is dismissed with prejudice, with each part
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . Based on the Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal entered by and between Plaintiff and Defendant (Dkt. 80, "the Stipulation") and for good cause shown: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Stipulation is approved; 2. Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose , 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and is dismissed with prejudice, with each party..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.
Based on the Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal entered by and between Plaintiff and Defendant (Dkt. 80, "the Stipulation") and for good cause shown:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Stipulation is approved;
2. Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
