Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Curtis B. v. Saul, 5:18-01051 ADS. (2020)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20200320607 Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2020
Summary: JUDGMENT OF REMAND AUTUMN D. SPAETH , Magistrate Judge . In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. No. 29, filed concurrently herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order of Remand. FootNotes 1. Plaintiff's name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.
More

JUDGMENT OF REMAND

In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. No. 29, filed concurrently herewith,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order of Remand.

FootNotes


1. Plaintiff's name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States.
2. The complaint, and thus the docket, do not name the Commissioner of Social Security. On June 17, 2019, Saul became the Commissioner. Thus, he is automatically substituted as the defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer