Castillo v. Johnson, EDCV 18-2187-VAP (KK). (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200320610
Visitors: 36
Filed: Mar. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2020
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Johnson's Motion to Dismiss the Third Ame
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Johnson's Motion to Dismiss the Third Amen..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, Chief District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Johnson's Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint is DENIED.
Source: Leagle