NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

OPINION

RAMIREZ, P.J.

On November 30, 2006, defendant pled no contest to inflicting corporal injury on a spouse or cohabitant (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a)). On December 28, 2006, the trial court withheld pronouncement of judgment and placed defendant on probation for three years.

On July 6, 2007, the probation department filed a petition with the court alleging that he was in violation of several terms of his probation, including not reporting to probation as instructed, not cooperating with probation, not reporting his residence and not completing 40 hours of community service. The trial court issued a bench warrant on July 18, 2007. Defendant was later arrested and appeared in court on January 25, 2008. On February 14, 2008, the court reinstated probation, sentenced defendant to 240 days in jail, and doubled the community service requirement to 80 hours.

On January 20, 2010, the probation department filed a petition with the trial court alleging that defendant had violated the terms of his probation by failing to cooperate with probation and failing to report his residence address. According to the petition, on May 6, 2009, defendant had notified probation that he was moving from Concord to Yucca Valley, and was instructed to provide his new address. Defendant never did so and probation was unable to locate defendant by address or telephone number. The trial court issued a bench warrant on January 25, 2010. On April 23, 2010, defendant admitted that he had failed to report to probation as directed. The trial court revoked defendant's probation and pronounced the previously withheld sentence of three years for corporal injury to a spouse or cohabitant.

On June 8, 2010, this appeal followed. Defendant obtained a certificate of probable cause. The grounds stated in the request for certificate of probable cause are: ineffective waiver of constitutional rights; ineffective assistance of counsel; inadequate advisement of rights; and plea induced by misrepresentations.

DISCUSSION

Upon defendant's request, this court appointed counsel to represent him on appeal. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493], setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues and requesting this court undertake a review of the entire record.

We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but he has not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we independently reviewed the record for potential error. We have now completed our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.

DISPOSITION

The conviction is affirmed.

We concur.

RICHLI, J.

CODRINGTON, J.