Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SALMON PROTECTION AND WATERSHED NETWORK v. COUNTY OF MARIN, A133109. (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals of California Number: incaco20120511020 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 11, 2012
Latest Update: May 11, 2012
Summary: CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING; NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on April 20, 2012, be modified as follows: On page 9, line 3, delete the sentence beginning with the words "Their interests may be sufficient . . .," and replace it with the following sentence: In granting their motion for intervention (Code Civ. Proc., 387), the trial court stated that interveners are "necessary" parties within the meanin
More

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING; NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on April 20, 2012, be modified as follows:

On page 9, line 3, delete the sentence beginning with the words "Their interests may be sufficient . . .," and replace it with the following sentence:

In granting their motion for intervention (Code Civ. Proc., § 387), the trial court stated that interveners are "necessary" parties within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section 389, subdivision (a) only because of SPAWN's request for an injunction prohibiting the approval of development projects on their properties, and that they are not "indispensable" parties within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section 389, subdivision (b).

This modification does not affect the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer