Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PEOPLE v. RAMOS, D064383. (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals of California Number: incaco20140728044 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2014
Summary: NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. AARON, J. On March 27, 2013, the victim left her parked car unlocked and with the engine running while she went inside an adjacent building. When she came b
More

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

AARON, J.

On March 27, 2013, the victim left her parked car unlocked and with the engine running while she went inside an adjacent building. When she came back outside, she saw Adolfo Ramos in the driver's seat of her car, backing out of the parking spot. A short time later, the police found Ramos driving the victim's car.

Ramos waived his right to a jury trial. The court found Ramos guilty of both grand theft of an automobile (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (d)(1); count 1) and unlawfully driving or taking a vehicle, (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a); count 2) and further found that he had served five prior prison terms (Pen. Code, §§ 667.5, subd. (b), 668). The court dismissed three of the prison priors and sentenced Ramos to five years in jail: the three-year middle term for grand theft of an automobile, a stayed term (Pen. Code, § 654) for unlawfully driving or taking a vehicle, and one year for each of the two remaining prison priors.

Ramos appeals, contending that his conviction for unlawfully driving or taking a vehicle must be reversed because it is a lesser included offense of grand theft of an automobile. Respondent properly concedes the point. A defendant cannot be convicted of grand theft of an automobile and unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle where, as here, both offenses are based on the same act. (People v. Barrick (1982) 33 Cal.3d 115, 128.)

DISPOSITION

The judgment is modified by striking the conviction for unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a); count 2). As so modified, the judgment is affirmed. The trial court is directed to prepare an amended abstract of judgment and to forward the amended abstract of judgment to the San Diego County Sheriff's Department.

BENKE, Acting P. J. and NARES, J., concurs.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer