1. On page 1, in the second full paragraph [246 Cal.App.4th 257, advance report, 1st line of Counsel segment], the name "VanRozenboom" is deleted and the name "VanRozeboom" is inserted in its place.
2. On page 2, the first full paragraph [246 Cal.App.4th 258, advance report, 1st par.], beginning "The trial court" is deleted and the following paragraph is inserted in its place:
The trial court ruled in favor of plaintiffs and respondents, the Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin, the Diocese, and the Episcopal Church. Defendants and appellants, Kevin Gunner, as administrator of the estate of John-David Schofield, the former Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin, the Anglican Diocese Holding Corporation, the Episcopal Foundation of San Joaquin, Inc., and the Diocesan Investment Trust of the Diocese of San Joaquin (DIT), argue the trial court erred by misconstruing an earlier decision by this court and failing to apply neutral principles of law.
3. On page 21 [246 Cal.App.4th 273, advance report, before 2d par.], before the last paragraph which begins "Beginning on March 27, 2008," the following subheading is inserted:
4. On page 21 [246 Cal.App.4th 273, advance report, 2d par., line 2], in the last paragraph, first sentence, the word "real" is added before the word "property" so that the sentence reads:
Beginning on March 27, 2008, and ending in August 2008, Schofield executed and recorded grant deeds for the disputed real property.
As of April 1, 2008, the Diocese had several investment accounts at the Fresno office of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill Lynch). Title to these accounts was in the name of either The Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin, a Corporation Sole or the DIT.
The DIT is a nonprofit corporation that was organized to receive, acquire, hold, manage, administer and expend funds for general charitable purposes and was authorized to establish one or more investment trust funds. The chief executive officer of the DIT is the incumbent bishop of the corporation sole, i.e., the Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin.
In April and May 2008, Schofield established accounts at Merrill Lynch in the name of the Holding Corporation and instructed Merrill Lynch to transfer nearly all of the assets in the diocesan investment accounts to the new Holding Corporation accounts. Thus, the assets went from being titled in the name of the Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin, a Corporation Sole and DIT to being titled in the name of the Holding Corporation.
However, as with the real property, Schofield was attempting to transfer property that was titled in the name of or under the control of the Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin when he no longer held that position. Rather, Lamb was the Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin. Accordingly, Schofield did not have the power to transfer the investment account assets to the accounts in the name of the Holding Corporation.
In sum, Schofield's attempts to transfer title of the real property from The Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin to The Anglican Bishop of San Joaquin and then to the Holding Corporation were invalid. Similarly, Schofield did not have authority to transfer the investment accounts to the Holding Corporation. Accordingly, the judgment returning the property to the Episcopal Church and the Diocese is affirmed.
Except for the modifications set forth, the opinion previously filed remains unchanged.
This modification does not effect a change in judgment.
The petition for rehearing filed by appellants is denied.
