Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Moore v. Moore, 9996_1 (1949)

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Number: 9996_1 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 12, 1949
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 179 F.2d 38 86 U.S.App.D.C. 16 MOORE, v. MOORE. No. 9996. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Oct. 31, 1949. Decided Dec. 12, 1949. Mr. Herman Miller, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Mr. James D. Graham, Jr., Washington, D.C. (appointed by this Court) for appellee. Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER and PROCTOR, Circuit Judges. PROCTOR, Circuit Judge. 1 Appellant attacks a limited divorce for cruelty, granted his wife, upon the ground of insufficient evidence to s
More

179 F.2d 38

86 U.S.App.D.C. 16

MOORE,
v.
MOORE.

No. 9996.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Oct. 31, 1949.
Decided Dec. 12, 1949.

Mr. Herman Miller, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. James D. Graham, Jr., Washington, D.C. (appointed by this Court) for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER and PROCTOR, Circuit Judges.

PROCTOR, Circuit Judge.

1

Appellant attacks a limited divorce for cruelty, granted his wife, upon the ground of insufficient evidence to support the judgment.

2

The courts of this jurisdiction have held consistently that under its laws1 where there is no physical violence a divorce for cruelty will not lie unless the mistreatment has caused injury to the health of the complaining spouse.2

3

In the present case there was no physical violence or abuse, and no evidence that the wife's health had suffered by reason of the husband's mistreatment and neglect. In these circumstances it is clear that the charge of cruelty was not proved. Therefore, the judgment is

4

Reversed.

EDGERTON, J., concurs in the result

1

Sec. 4, Act of June 19, 1860, 12 Stat.at Large, p. 59, 31 Stat. 1345, ch. 854, § 966, March 3, 1901, D.C. Code 1929, Tit. 14, § 63, 49 Stat. 539, ch. 453, § 1, Aug. 7, 1935, D.C. Code 1940, § 16-403

2

Densmore v. Densmore, 1888, 6 Mackey 544, 17 D.C. 544; Ogden v. Ogden, 1900, 17 App.D.C. 104; Waltenberg v. Waltenberg, 1924, 54 App.D.C. 383, 298 F. 842; Trice v. Trice, 1925, 55 App.D.C. 328, 5 F.2d 543; Taylor v. Taylor, 1933, 62 App.D.C. 316, 67 F.2d 582; Kimmell v. Kimmell, 1948, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 177, 171 F.2d 340

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer