Filed: Jul. 05, 1951
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 195 F.2d 208 89 U.S.App.D.C. 410 James WRIGHT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 10966. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued June 20, 1951. Decided July 5, 1951. Carl L. Shipley, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Joseph F. Goetten, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty., and Joseph A. Sommer and Joseph M. Howard, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee. Before PRETTYMAN, FAH
Summary: 195 F.2d 208 89 U.S.App.D.C. 410 James WRIGHT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 10966. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued June 20, 1951. Decided July 5, 1951. Carl L. Shipley, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Joseph F. Goetten, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty., and Joseph A. Sommer and Joseph M. Howard, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee. Before PRETTYMAN, FAHY..
More
195 F.2d 208
89 U.S.App.D.C. 410
James WRIGHT, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 10966.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued June 20, 1951.
Decided July 5, 1951.
Carl L. Shipley, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Joseph F. Goetten, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty., and Joseph A. Sommer and Joseph M. Howard, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before PRETTYMAN, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
We find in this record no error affecting substantial rights of the appellant. The judgment of the District Court is therefore
