Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mathilda Fioravanti v. Quirino Fioravanti, 12965_1 (1956)

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Number: 12965_1 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 29, 1956
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 231 F.2d 776 98 U.S.App.D.C. 23 Mathilda FIORAVANTI, Appellant, v. Quirino FIORAVANTI, Appellee. No. 12965. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued March 20, 1956. Decided March 29, 1956. Mr. Charles H. Quimby, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Mr. Alvin L. Newmyer, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Alvin L. Newmyer, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee. Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and WILBUR K. MILLER and DANAHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The que
More

231 F.2d 776

98 U.S.App.D.C. 23

Mathilda FIORAVANTI, Appellant,
v.
Quirino FIORAVANTI, Appellee.

No. 12965.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 20, 1956.
Decided March 29, 1956.

Mr. Charles H. Quimby, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Alvin L. Newmyer, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Alvin L. Newmyer, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and WILBUR K. MILLER and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The question is whether the District Court may in its discretion reduce or cancel, at a later date, periodic installments of payments for maintenance as of the date when application for such relief is made. We re-affirm our decision in Dausuel v. Dausuel, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 275, 276, 195 F.2d 774, 775, that the court may do so. Cf. Kephart v. Kephart, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 380, 193 F.2d 677, 684, certiorari denied 342 U.S. 944, 72 S. Ct. 557, 96 L. Ed. 702; 6 A.L.R. 2d 1277, 1328.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer