Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, Intervenor, 13996_1 (1958)

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Number: 13996_1 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 27, 1958
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 257 F.2d 199 103 U.S.App.D.C. 195 WORZ, Inc., Appellant, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, Intervenor. No. 13996. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued April 1, 1958. Decided May 15, 1958, Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied June 10, 1958, Certiorari Granted, Judgment Vacated Oct. 27, 1958. Mr. Eliot C. Lovett, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Mr. John H. Conlin, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, with who
More

257 F.2d 199

103 U.S.App.D.C. 195

WORZ, Inc., Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee, Mid-Florida
Television Corporation, Intervenor.

No. 13996.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued April 1, 1958.
Decided May 15, 1958, Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied
June 10, 1958, Certiorari Granted, Judgment
Vacated Oct. 27, 1958.

Mr. Eliot C. Lovett, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. John H. Conlin, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, with whom Messrs. Warren E. Baker, Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Edgar W. Holtz, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, and Richard A. Solomon, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, were on the brief, for appellee.

Mr. Paul Dobin, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Leonard H. Marks, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for intervenor.

Before FAHY, WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This is an appeal from an order of the Federal Communications Commission, granting television Channel 9 in Orlando, Florida, to intervenor Mid-Florida Television Corporation. Appellant, the unsuccessful applicant, challenges the Commission's action. After reviewing appellant's contentions, we find no basis for disturbing the Commission's award. See Tampa Times Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 1956, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 256, 230 F.2d 224.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer