Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

William T. Spence v. Balogh & Company, Inc., 17399_1 (1963)

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Number: 17399_1 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 28, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 317 F.2d 909 115 U.S.App.D.C. 209 William T. SPENCE, Appellant, v. BALOGH & COMPANY, Inc., Appellee. No. 17399. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued March 13, 1963. Decided April 25, 1963, Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied May 28, 1963. Mr. Cornelius H. Doherty, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Cornelius H. Doherty, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Alan L. Wurtzel, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Harold P. Green and Daniel M. Singe
More

317 F.2d 909

115 U.S.App.D.C. 209

William T. SPENCE, Appellant,
v.
BALOGH & COMPANY, Inc., Appellee.

No. 17399.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 13, 1963.
Decided April 25, 1963, Petition for Rehearing En Banc
Denied May 28, 1963.

Mr. Cornelius H. Doherty, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Cornelius H. Doherty, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Alan L. Wurtzel, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Harold P. Green and Daniel M. Singer, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WASHINGTON and BURGER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This is a suit brought by plaintiff-appellant to require delivery of certain shares of stock, or, alternatively, to recover money damages. The facts are set out in the opinion of District Judge Jones. 216 F. Supp. 492 (1962).1 For the reasons given in that opinion, the judgment of the District Court, dismissing the action on its merits after trial, will be

2

Affirmed.

1

See also Spence v. Northern Virginia Doctors Hospital Corp., 202 Va. 478, 117 S.E.2d 657 (1961). (1961)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer