Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

19367_1 (1965)

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Number: 19367_1 Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 23, 1965
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 354 F.2d 515 122 U.S.App.D.C. 383 Elizabeth DE GASTER, Joseph Philips and George Philips, individually, and as administrator with the will Annexed, of the Estate of Philip Philips, deceased, and of the Estate of Adolph Philips, deceased, respectively, Appellants, v. Henry H. FOWLER, as Secretary of the Treasury of the United States of America, Appellee. No. 19367. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Nov. 23, 1965. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Dist
More

354 F.2d 515

122 U.S.App.D.C. 383

Elizabeth DE GASTER, Joseph Philips and George Philips,
individually, and as administrator with the will Annexed, of
the Estate of Philip Philips, deceased, and of the Estate of
Adolph Philips, deceased, respectively, Appellants,
v.
Henry H. FOWLER, as Secretary of the Treasury of the United
States of America, Appellee.

No. 19367.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Nov. 23, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; William B. Jones, Judge. 247 F. Supp. 511 (1963).

Mr. Samuel Herman, with whom Mr. William H. Collins, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. John C. Eldridge, Attorney, Department of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. John W. Douglas, Mr. John C. Conliff, Jr., U.S. Atty. at the time the brief was filed, and Mr. Morton Hollander, Attorney, Department of Justice, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before WRIGHT, TAMM and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This case came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.

2

On consideration whereof, and this court being in general agreement with the excellent opinion filed by the District Court in this case,

3

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this case be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer