Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, 84-1410 (1985)

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Number: 84-1410 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 01, 1985
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 760 F.2d 1320 245 U.S.App.D.C. 296 SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE, et al. v. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and the United States of America. No. 84-1410. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. May 1, 1985. Before ROBINSON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, TAMM, WALD, MIKVA, EDWARDS, GINSBURG, BORK, SCALIA and STARR, Circuit Judges. ORDER PER CURIAM. 1 Upon consideration of petitioners' motion for leave to file exhibits in support of the suggestion for rehearing en
More

760 F.2d 1320

245 U.S.App.D.C. 296

SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE, et al.
v.
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and the United
States of America.

No. 84-1410.

United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.

May 1, 1985.

Before ROBINSON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, TAMM, WALD, MIKVA, EDWARDS, GINSBURG, BORK, SCALIA and STARR, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon consideration of petitioners' motion for leave to file exhibits in support of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, the responses thereto, and of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, it is

2

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the motion for leave to file exhibits is granted, and it is

3

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that petitioners' suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted in part, and it is

4

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that only Section III.B of the Court's opinion, 751 F.2d 1287 and the corresponding part of the judgment of the Court, issued on December 31, 1984, are hereby vacated, and it is

5

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the full power operating license remains in effect and is not stayed pending the rehearing en banc.

6

BORK, Circuit Judge would deny the motion for leave to file exhibits in support of the suggestion and would deny the suggestion.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer