Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

New Life Evangelistic Center, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Dominion Broadcasting, Inc., Intervenor, 89-1256 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Number: 89-1256
Filed: Feb. 07, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 895 F.2d 809 282 U.S.App.D.C. 404 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. NEW LIFE EVANGELISTIC CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Dominion Broadcasting, Inc., Intervenor. No. 89-1256. Unite
More

895 F.2d 809

282 U.S.App.D.C. 404

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
NEW LIFE EVANGELISTIC CENTER, INC., Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION,
Dominion Broadcasting, Inc., Intervenor.

No. 89-1256.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Feb. 7, 1990.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, and RUTH B. GINSBURG and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal was considered on the record from the Federal Communications Commission and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. After full review, we are satisfied that appropriate disposition of the case does not warrant an opinion. See D.C.Cir.R. 14(c). We find no good cause to disturb the Commission's reasoned and adequately supported determinations that Dominion Broadcasting, Inc. was technically and financially qualified. Accordingly, it is

2

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decision from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed.

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.R. 15(b)(2).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer