Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cornelia F. Dutcher, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Jeffrey Miller v. United States of America, U.S. Veterans Administration, 90-5123 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Number: 90-5123
Filed: Oct. 01, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 923 F.2d 200 287 U.S.App.D.C. 377 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. Cornelia F. DUTCHER, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Jeffrey Miller, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, U.S. Veterans A
More

923 F.2d 200

287 U.S.App.D.C. 377

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Cornelia F. DUTCHER, Individually and as Administratrix of
the Estate of Jeffrey Miller, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, U.S. Veterans Administration.

No. 90-5123.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 1, 1990.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, and HARRY T. EDWARDS and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon consideration of appellee's motion for summary affirmance and the response thereto, it is

2

ORDERED that the motion be granted. Because "the district court's account of the evidence is plausible in light of the record viewed in its entirety," see Anderson v. Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573-74 (1985), appellant has failed to meet the clearly erroneous standard of review applicable to factual findings and cannot prevail on appeal. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a) ("Findings of fact, whether based on oral or documentary evidence, shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge of the credibility of the witnesses."). The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers' Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer