Filed: May 13, 2021
Latest Update: May 13, 2021
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
____________
No. 21-5067 September Term, 2020
1:21-cv-00416-UNA
Filed On: May 13, 2021
Mary Jo Weidrick,
Appellant
v.
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President and United
States Congress, parties acting in both
professional and personal capacities,
Appellees
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BEFORE: Tatel and Pillard, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant, including a
request to expedite this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order, filed March 4, 2021,
be affirmed. Appellant has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in
dismissing the case as frivolous. See Crisafi v. Holland,
655 F.2d 1305, 1307–08 (D.C.
Cir. 1981) (“A court may dismiss as frivolous complaints . . . postulating events and
circumstances of a wholly fanciful kind.”). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the request to expedite this appeal be dismissed as
moot.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
____________
No. 21-5067 September Term, 2020
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.
P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY: /s/
Daniel J. Reidy
Deputy Clerk
Page 2