U.S. v. DREYFUSS & BLACKFORD ARCHITECTS, 2:10-cv-1965-JAM-DAD. (2011)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20110210d43
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 10, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2011
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S AMENDED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge. Defendant, Dreyfuss & Blackford Architects, has moved for a stay of the present suit concerning its 2005 tax year. (Dkt. #8.) Having considered Defendant's Motion, the papers filed in support of and in opposition of the motion, as well as the arguments of counsel, for the reasons stated at the February 9, 2011 hearing on the matter the Court denies Defendant's motion to stay proceedings. It is hereby O
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S AMENDED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge. Defendant, Dreyfuss & Blackford Architects, has moved for a stay of the present suit concerning its 2005 tax year. (Dkt. #8.) Having considered Defendant's Motion, the papers filed in support of and in opposition of the motion, as well as the arguments of counsel, for the reasons stated at the February 9, 2011 hearing on the matter the Court denies Defendant's motion to stay proceedings. It is hereby OR..
More
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S AMENDED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Defendant, Dreyfuss & Blackford Architects, has moved for a stay of the present suit concerning its 2005 tax year. (Dkt. #8.) Having considered Defendant's Motion, the papers filed in support of and in opposition of the motion, as well as the arguments of counsel, for the reasons stated at the February 9, 2011 hearing on the matter the Court denies Defendant's motion to stay proceedings. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's motion is DENIED. This denial is without prejudice to Defendant renewing its motion for a stay consistent with the instructions of the Court at the February 9, 2011 hearing concerning the IRS Appeals Office's consideration of its 2006 tax year.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 9th day of February, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S AMENDED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the following:
ADAM R. SMART
Trial Attorney, Tax Division
Source: Leagle
