PASION v. HAVILAND, 2:10-cv-03227-GGH. (2011)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20111104664
Visitors: 15
Filed: Nov. 03, 2011
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2011
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. Defendant CAPPEL seeks an order from the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendant's counsel to conduct the deposition of plaintiff GEORGE M. PASION (E-16624) via video conference. Having read defense counsel's request, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' request to conduct plaintiff's deposition via video conference is GRANTED. 2. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal inst
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. Defendant CAPPEL seeks an order from the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendant's counsel to conduct the deposition of plaintiff GEORGE M. PASION (E-16624) via video conference. Having read defense counsel's request, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' request to conduct plaintiff's deposition via video conference is GRANTED. 2. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal insti..
More
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant CAPPEL seeks an order from the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendant's counsel to conduct the deposition of plaintiff GEORGE M. PASION (E-16624) via video conference.
Having read defense counsel's request,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' request to conduct plaintiff's deposition via video conference is GRANTED.
2. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.
Source: Leagle
