WILSON v. NESBETH, CIV S-06-1139 KJM GGH P. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120106747
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2012
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. On November 21, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for a protective order to obtain his legal materials so he could file a pretrial statement. Doc. 61. Defendant filed a reply on December 19, 2011, and indicated that plaintiff was provided access to his legal materials and has filed his pretrial statement. Docs. 62, 67, 68. Therefore, plaintiff's motion for a protective order is denied as moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion f
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. On November 21, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for a protective order to obtain his legal materials so he could file a pretrial statement. Doc. 61. Defendant filed a reply on December 19, 2011, and indicated that plaintiff was provided access to his legal materials and has filed his pretrial statement. Docs. 62, 67, 68. Therefore, plaintiff's motion for a protective order is denied as moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion fo..
More
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
On November 21, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for a protective order to obtain his legal materials so he could file a pretrial statement. Doc. 61. Defendant filed a reply on December 19, 2011, and indicated that plaintiff was provided access to his legal materials and has filed his pretrial statement. Docs. 62, 67, 68. Therefore, plaintiff's motion for a protective order is denied as moot.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a protective order (Doc. 61) is denied as moot.
Source: Leagle
