WILLIAMS v. HUFFMAN, 2:11-cv-0638 GEB KJN P. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120113862
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2012
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. On December 5, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to compel defendants Austin, Traquina and Mefford to produce documents or provide answers to interrogatories propounded on October 14, 2011. (Dkt. No. 41.) Plaintiff states no responses or documents have been provided. ( Id. ) Twenty-one days have passed, and defendants have not filed an opposition or otherwise responded to the motion. Thus, defendants Austin, Traquina and Mefford shall show
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. On December 5, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to compel defendants Austin, Traquina and Mefford to produce documents or provide answers to interrogatories propounded on October 14, 2011. (Dkt. No. 41.) Plaintiff states no responses or documents have been provided. ( Id. ) Twenty-one days have passed, and defendants have not filed an opposition or otherwise responded to the motion. Thus, defendants Austin, Traquina and Mefford shall show ..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
On December 5, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to compel defendants Austin, Traquina and Mefford to produce documents or provide answers to interrogatories propounded on October 14, 2011. (Dkt. No. 41.) Plaintiff states no responses or documents have been provided. (Id.) Twenty-one days have passed, and defendants have not filed an opposition or otherwise responded to the motion. Thus, defendants Austin, Traquina and Mefford shall show cause, within twenty-one days, why plaintiff's motion to compel should not be granted.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the date of this order, defendants Austin, Traquina and Mefford shall show cause, if any they may have, why plaintiff's December 5, 2011 motion to compel should not be granted.
Source: Leagle
