HODNETT v. SCHWARZENEGGER, 2:07-cv-0758-LDG. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120209899
Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 07, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2012
Summary: ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge. On December 12, 2011, defendants Mason, Jenesky and Mirza filed an amended motion to dismiss for failure to attend deposition and comply with court order (#71). Plaintiff failed to file an opposition. After plaintiff failed to appear for a deposition, the court on April 7, 2011, ordered plaintiff to appear for his next scheduled deposition or risk dismissal of his claims (#67). Plaintiff failed to appear for the properly-noticed deposition scheduled for
Summary: ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge. On December 12, 2011, defendants Mason, Jenesky and Mirza filed an amended motion to dismiss for failure to attend deposition and comply with court order (#71). Plaintiff failed to file an opposition. After plaintiff failed to appear for a deposition, the court on April 7, 2011, ordered plaintiff to appear for his next scheduled deposition or risk dismissal of his claims (#67). Plaintiff failed to appear for the properly-noticed deposition scheduled for M..
More
ORDER
LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge.
On December 12, 2011, defendants Mason, Jenesky and Mirza filed an amended motion to dismiss for failure to attend deposition and comply with court order (#71). Plaintiff failed to file an opposition. After plaintiff failed to appear for a deposition, the court on April 7, 2011, ordered plaintiff to appear for his next scheduled deposition or risk dismissal of his claims (#67). Plaintiff failed to appear for the properly-noticed deposition scheduled for May 16, 2011. Based on a review of the record, arguments of the parties, and plaintiff's failure to cooperate with discovery, the orders of the court, and the rules of court,
THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that defendants Mason, Jenesky and Mirza's motion to dismiss (#71) is GRANTED.
THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that defendants' request for monetary sanctions is hereby DENIED without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
