BALTHROPE v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 2:10-cv-3003-KJM-JFM (PS). (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120221753
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOHN F. MOULDS, Magistrate Judge. On January 20, 2012, plaintiff filed a request that the depositions scheduled for February 16, 2012 not be videotaped. To the extent this motion can be construed as a motion for protective order, it is procedurally defective. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c); Local Rule 251. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion is denied.
ORDER
JOHN F. MOULDS, Magistrate Judge.
On January 20, 2012, plaintiff filed a request that the depositions scheduled for February 16, 2012 not be videotaped. To the extent this motion can be construed as a motion for protective order, it is procedurally defective. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c); Local Rule 251. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion is denied.
Source: Leagle
