CHAN v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CIV S-09-2006 MCE GGH P. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120224947
Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma paupers, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief was denied and plaintiff filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit. On February 15, 2012, the Ninth Circuit referred the matter back to this court for the limited purpose of determining whether plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should continue for the appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in ba
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma paupers, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief was denied and plaintiff filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit. On February 15, 2012, the Ninth Circuit referred the matter back to this court for the limited purpose of determining whether plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should continue for the appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad..
More
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma paupers, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief was denied and plaintiff filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit. On February 15, 2012, the Ninth Circuit referred the matter back to this court for the limited purpose of determining whether plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should continue for the appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith.
Plaintiff's appeal is not frivolous or taken in bad faith and his in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status shall continue;
2. The Clerk shall serve this order upon the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 12-15250.
Source: Leagle
