Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CARTER v. ASTRUE, CIV S-10-1949 GGH (TEMP). (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20120228717 Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the court is plaintiff's application for an award of attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(1). Plaintiff seeks attorney's fees for 1.8 hours at $174.64/hour for work done in 2010 and for 18.1 hours at the same rate for work performed in 2011, for a total amount of $3,475.33. The Commissioner has filed a statement of non-opposition in which the amount requested is not contested. In addition, t
More

ORDER

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the court is plaintiff's application for an award of attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1). Plaintiff seeks attorney's fees for 1.8 hours at $174.64/hour for work done in 2010 and for 18.1 hours at the same rate for work performed in 2011, for a total amount of $3,475.33. The Commissioner has filed a statement of non-opposition in which the amount requested is not contested. In addition, the Commissioner has no objection to payment of the fees being made directly to plaintiff's counsel.

The EAJA provides that the prevailing party in a civil action against the United States may apply for an order for attorneys' fees and expenses within thirty days of final judgment in the action. An applicant for Social Security benefits receiving a remand under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) is a prevailing party, regardless of whether the applicant later succeeds in obtaining the requested benefits. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). In this case, the matter was voluntarily remanded under sentence four pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and order of the court. See Order filed September 15, 2011. Plaintiff thus is entitled to an award of fees under the EAJA. The court must allow the fee award unless it finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified. Flores v. Shalala, 49 F.3d 562, 568-69 (9th Cir. 1995).

Having no opposition from the Commissioner on the issue of substantial justification and no objection to the amount requested, the court finds that the requested fees are reasonable and that plaintiff is entitled to the amount requested. In light of the Commissioner's agreement to pay the fee directly to plaintiff's counsel, the court shall so order payment.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's December 14, 2011 request for EAJA fees is granted. Plaintiff is awarded $3,475.33 in attorney's fees. Said fees shall be made payable to plaintiff's counsel.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer