RUNDLE v. WARDEN, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, 2:08-cv-01879 GEB KJN. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120305491
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 01, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2012
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner seeks leave to file a brief in excess of 25 pages. However, petitioner's brief is not subject to a page limitation by rule or court order. The only rule somewhat related is the requirement that petitioner provide the court a courtesy paper copy of any electronically filed brief which exceeds 25 pages. Local Rule 133(f). Accordingly, petitioner's February 29, 2012 request to file an oversized brief is dismissed as unnecessary. (However, to
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner seeks leave to file a brief in excess of 25 pages. However, petitioner's brief is not subject to a page limitation by rule or court order. The only rule somewhat related is the requirement that petitioner provide the court a courtesy paper copy of any electronically filed brief which exceeds 25 pages. Local Rule 133(f). Accordingly, petitioner's February 29, 2012 request to file an oversized brief is dismissed as unnecessary. (However, to t..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner seeks leave to file a brief in excess of 25 pages. However, petitioner's brief is not subject to a page limitation by rule or court order. The only rule somewhat related is the requirement that petitioner provide the court a courtesy paper copy of any electronically filed brief which exceeds 25 pages. Local Rule 133(f).
Accordingly, petitioner's February 29, 2012 request to file an oversized brief is dismissed as unnecessary. (However, to the extent possible, brevity is appreciated.)
Source: Leagle
