PARLANTE v. CAZARES, CIV S-11-2696 MCE GGH PS. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120308952
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2012
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. On March 5, 2012, the court denied defendant Ravandi's motion to dismiss as moot. The court further stated that if plaintiff elects to amend, plaintiff shall serve the first amended complaint on counsel for defendant Ravandi within 28 days of the March 5, 2012 order, and that no further service of process on defendant Ravandi is required. (Dkt. No. 22.) For purposes of clarity, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT defendant Ravandi shall respond to any first
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. On March 5, 2012, the court denied defendant Ravandi's motion to dismiss as moot. The court further stated that if plaintiff elects to amend, plaintiff shall serve the first amended complaint on counsel for defendant Ravandi within 28 days of the March 5, 2012 order, and that no further service of process on defendant Ravandi is required. (Dkt. No. 22.) For purposes of clarity, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT defendant Ravandi shall respond to any first a..
More
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
On March 5, 2012, the court denied defendant Ravandi's motion to dismiss as moot. The court further stated that if plaintiff elects to amend, plaintiff shall serve the first amended complaint on counsel for defendant Ravandi within 28 days of the March 5, 2012 order, and that no further service of process on defendant Ravandi is required. (Dkt. No. 22.) For purposes of clarity, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT defendant Ravandi shall respond to any first amended complaint within 21 days of service. No response to the dismissed original complaint is required.
Source: Leagle
