IN RE SK FOODS, L.P., S-11-1839 LKK (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120404892
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge. The hearing on this appeal is hereby re-scheduled for April 23, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. The parties are advised that Frederick Scott Salyer has entered a plea of guilty, U.S. v. Salyer , 10 Cr. 61 (March 23, 2012), and that a contested sentencing hearing is currently scheduled for July 10, 2012. Appellees shall therefore file a letter with this court no later than seven days from the date of this order advising this court whether they still requi
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge. The hearing on this appeal is hereby re-scheduled for April 23, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. The parties are advised that Frederick Scott Salyer has entered a plea of guilty, U.S. v. Salyer , 10 Cr. 61 (March 23, 2012), and that a contested sentencing hearing is currently scheduled for July 10, 2012. Appellees shall therefore file a letter with this court no later than seven days from the date of this order advising this court whether they still requir..
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
The hearing on this appeal is hereby re-scheduled for April 23, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.
The parties are advised that Frederick Scott Salyer has entered a plea of guilty, U.S. v. Salyer, 10 Cr. 61 (March 23, 2012), and that a contested sentencing hearing is currently scheduled for July 10, 2012.
Appellees shall therefore file a letter with this court no later than seven days from the date of this order advising this court whether they still require a stay of the bankruptcy court proceedings, in light of the guilty plea. The letter shall be no longer than two pages in length, and shall only advise the court, and shall not argue, re-argue or supplement their appeal papers.
Appellant (the Trustee), may file a responsive letter, no later than seven days from the date of appellees' letter, which shall be subject to the same constraints as were imposed on appellees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
