Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

VOTINO v. JACQUEZ, 2:10-cv-1784 MCE-JFM (HC). (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20120420851 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOHN F. MOULDS, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. By order filed October 19, 2010, this matter was stayed pending exhaustion of state remedies as to petitioner's claim of newly discovered evidence of actual innocence and petitioner was directed to file a motion to lift the stay within thirty days from the date of any order by the California Supreme Court resolving that claim
More

ORDER

JOHN F. MOULDS, Magistrate Judge.

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By order filed October 19, 2010, this matter was stayed pending exhaustion of state remedies as to petitioner's claim of newly discovered evidence of actual innocence and petitioner was directed to file a motion to lift the stay within thirty days from the date of any order by the California Supreme Court resolving that claim. On March 28, 2012, petitioner filed a first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner on March 28, 2012 is construed as including a motion to lift the stay of this action;

2. Within fifteen days from the date of this order respondent shall file and serve a response to said motion; and

3. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served not later than ten days thereafter.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer