DOSTY v. SWARTHOUT, CIV S-10-1602 DAD. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120501777
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. As directed, respondent filed an Answer on September 1, 2010. Therein, respondent cited the Clerk's Transcript and the unpublished California Court of Appeal opinion and stated an intention to lodge the state appellate record with this court. (Answer To Petition For Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 8), at 5). However, no such lodging w
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. As directed, respondent filed an Answer on September 1, 2010. Therein, respondent cited the Clerk's Transcript and the unpublished California Court of Appeal opinion and stated an intention to lodge the state appellate record with this court. (Answer To Petition For Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 8), at 5). However, no such lodging wa..
More
ORDER
DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. As directed, respondent filed an Answer on September 1, 2010. Therein, respondent cited the Clerk's Transcript and the unpublished California Court of Appeal opinion and stated an intention to lodge the state appellate record with this court. (Answer To Petition For Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 8), at 5). However, no such lodging was thereafter made in this court. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, within thirty days from the date of this order, Respondent shall lodge with this court the state appellate record.
Source: Leagle
