MARTIN v. ALLISON, CIV S-11-0870 LKK EFB P. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120501785
Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On April 23, 2012, petitioner requested the court issue an order directing prison officials to grant him "Priority Library User" status. Petitioner contends that he will not be able to timely file his traverse without "priority" status. Petitioner has failed to show that the amount of law library time he receives without priority sta
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On April 23, 2012, petitioner requested the court issue an order directing prison officials to grant him "Priority Library User" status. Petitioner contends that he will not be able to timely file his traverse without "priority" status. Petitioner has failed to show that the amount of law library time he receives without priority stat..
More
ORDER
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 23, 2012, petitioner requested the court issue an order directing prison officials to grant him "Priority Library User" status. Petitioner contends that he will not be able to timely file his traverse without "priority" status. Petitioner has failed to show that the amount of law library time he receives without priority status is somehow inadequate. Furthermore, the court has already granted petitioner 210 additional days to file and serve his traverse.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that petitioner's April 23, 2012 motion is denied without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
