Filed: May 07, 2012
Latest Update: May 07, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Docs. 20, 27) ANTHONY ISHII, District Judge. State Farm Life Insurance Company (""State Farm" or "Plaintiff") seeks the entry of default judgment against defendant Eduardo Canul ("Defendant"), who has not appeared in the action. On April 10, 2012, the Magistrate Judge found the factors set forth by the Ninth Circuit in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470 , 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986), weighed in
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Docs. 20, 27) ANTHONY ISHII, District Judge. State Farm Life Insurance Company (""State Farm" or "Plaintiff") seeks the entry of default judgment against defendant Eduardo Canul ("Defendant"), who has not appeared in the action. On April 10, 2012, the Magistrate Judge found the factors set forth by the Ninth Circuit in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470 , 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986), weighed in ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Docs. 20, 27)
ANTHONY ISHII, District Judge.
State Farm Life Insurance Company (""State Farm" or "Plaintiff") seeks the entry of default judgment against defendant Eduardo Canul ("Defendant"), who has not appeared in the action. On April 10, 2012, the Magistrate Judge found the factors set forth by the Ninth Circuit in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986), weighed in favor of default judgment, and the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that Plaintiff's motion be granted. (Doc. 27).
The Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties, and contained a notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen days of service, or by April 24, 2012. (Id. at 5). The parties were advised failure to file objections may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. (Id.). However, no party has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the findings and recommendation are supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed April 10, 2012 (Doc. 27), are ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. Default judgment is entered against defendant Eduardo Canul with Plaintiff as the prevailing party;
3. Eduardo Canul is permanently enjoined from instituting or prosecuting any proceeding in any State or United States Court against Plaintiff and/or its agents, affiliates, parents, subsidiaries, attorneys or assigns, with respect to life insurance policy number LF-2255-8658; and
4. Plaintiff is discharged from all liability to Eduardo Canul in this action or under life insurance policy number LF-2255-8658.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
