Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SCHNEIDER v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A, 2:11-cv-2953 LKK DAD PS. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20120509838 Visitors: 22
Filed: May 08, 2012
Latest Update: May 08, 2012
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, Christopher Schneider, is proceeding in this action pro se. The case was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). On March 16, 2012, the parties appeared before the undersigned for an Early Settlement Conference. After engaging in settlement negotiations a tentative settlement agreement was reached, subject to approval by defendant Bank of America. On March 26, 2012, defendant Bank of Ame
More

ORDER

DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff, Christopher Schneider, is proceeding in this action pro se. The case was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

On March 16, 2012, the parties appeared before the undersigned for an Early Settlement Conference. After engaging in settlement negotiations a tentative settlement agreement was reached, subject to approval by defendant Bank of America. On March 26, 2012, defendant Bank of America filed a notice of approval of settlement terms. (Doc. No. 70.) On April 17, 2012, however, plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file a second amended complaint, in which plaintiff indicates that "settlement negotiations [are] taking additional time ..." (Doc. No. 71 at 1.)

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Status of Settlement Conference is set for Friday, May 25, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. before the undersigned; and

2. The parties shall appear at the Status of Settlement Conference telephonically.1 Each party shall pre-arrange their appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128 at least 48 hours before the Status of Settlement Conference. A land line telephone number must be provided.

FootNotes


1. Because it is anticipated that the conference will be brief, the court is directing that both parties appear telephonically.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer