LUCERO v. MAYBERG, CIV S-10-2132 GGH P. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120516a41
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 15, 2012
Latest Update: May 15, 2012
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. It has come to the court's attention that this matter may benefit from a settlement conference. Both the state defendants and the county defendants have filed their separate answers to the first amended complaint. Before a settlement conference will be set all parties are to inform the court, within fourteen days, whether they are amenable to settlement negotiations and, if so, whether they are willing to waive disqualification of the undersigned ju
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. It has come to the court's attention that this matter may benefit from a settlement conference. Both the state defendants and the county defendants have filed their separate answers to the first amended complaint. Before a settlement conference will be set all parties are to inform the court, within fourteen days, whether they are amenable to settlement negotiations and, if so, whether they are willing to waive disqualification of the undersigned jud..
More
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
It has come to the court's attention that this matter may benefit from a settlement conference. Both the state defendants and the county defendants have filed their separate answers to the first amended complaint. Before a settlement conference will be set all parties are to inform the court, within fourteen days, whether they are amenable to settlement negotiations and, if so, whether they are willing to waive disqualification of the undersigned judge to preside over the settlement conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle