Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MESTER v. DICKINSON, 2:09-cv-3307 KJM KJN P. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20120518600 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 16, 2012
Latest Update: May 16, 2012
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. On May 4, 2012, plaintiff filed a document styled, "Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss." (Dkt. No. 118.) However, plaintiff claims he did not receive a copy of defendant Reed's motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of defendant Reed's motion, and plaintiff is granted an extension of time in which to file an opposition to the motion. As explained in this court's April 24, 2012 order, failur
More

ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

On May 4, 2012, plaintiff filed a document styled, "Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss." (Dkt. No. 118.) However, plaintiff claims he did not receive a copy of defendant Reed's motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of defendant Reed's motion, and plaintiff is granted an extension of time in which to file an opposition to the motion. As explained in this court's April 24, 2012 order, failure to file an opposition may result in the dismissal of this action. (Dkt. No. 117.)

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of defendant Reed's March 12, 2012 motion to dismiss (dkt. no. 116); and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed within seven days thereafter.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer