McPHEARSON v. IVES, 2:09-cv-1889 JAM DAD (HC). (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120531851
Visitors: 19
Filed: May 29, 2012
Latest Update: May 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. On April 17, 2012, petitioner filed a motion to expand the record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2247. By order filed May 4, 2012, the district court lifted the stay of this action and set a briefing schedule for resolution of petitioner's claims. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the date of t
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. On April 17, 2012, petitioner filed a motion to expand the record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2247. By order filed May 4, 2012, the district court lifted the stay of this action and set a briefing schedule for resolution of petitioner's claims. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the date of th..
More
ORDER
DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On April 17, 2012, petitioner filed a motion to expand the record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2247. By order filed May 4, 2012, the district court lifted the stay of this action and set a briefing schedule for resolution of petitioner's claims.
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the date of this order respondent shall file and serve a response to petitioner's April 17, 2012 motion to expand the record. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served not later than fourteen days thereafter.
Source: Leagle
