Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

FAIRFIELD-SUISUN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CIV. S-11-2796 LKK/GGH. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20120601e92 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 31, 2012
Latest Update: May 31, 2012
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge. Defendant State of California Department of Education filed a Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 18, which was set for hearing on June 4, 2012. Plaintiff did not file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion, and the deadline for doing so has passed. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows: [1] The hearing on defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 18, is CONTINUED to July 23, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. [2] Plaintiff SHALL file an opposition or
More

ORDER

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.

Defendant State of California Department of Education filed a Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 18, which was set for hearing on June 4, 2012. Plaintiff did not file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion, and the deadline for doing so has passed. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows:

[1] The hearing on defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 18, is CONTINUED to July 23, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. [2] Plaintiff SHALL file an opposition or statement of non-opposition no later than July 9, 2012. [3] Defendant MAY file a reply no later than July 16, 2012. [4] Plaintiff's counsel is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE in writing why sanctions should not issue in accordance with Local Rule 110, in the amount of $150.00 for failure to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. Counsel SHALL file a response to this order to show cause within seven (7) days of the issuance of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer