JOHNSON v. EID, CIV S-11-1295 KJM-KJN. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120604495
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 01, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2012
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. On May 3, 2012, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause, within fourteen days, why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to effect service within 120 days of the filing of the complaint. (ECF 20.) Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement on May 15, 2012. (ECF 21.) Plaintiff has not responded to the court's order to show cause. Accordingly, this matter is dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110. The clerk of the court is directed
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. On May 3, 2012, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause, within fourteen days, why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to effect service within 120 days of the filing of the complaint. (ECF 20.) Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement on May 15, 2012. (ECF 21.) Plaintiff has not responded to the court's order to show cause. Accordingly, this matter is dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110. The clerk of the court is directed t..
More
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
On May 3, 2012, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause, within fourteen days, why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to effect service within 120 days of the filing of the complaint. (ECF 20.) Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement on May 15, 2012. (ECF 21.) Plaintiff has not responded to the court's order to show cause.
Accordingly, this matter is dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110. The clerk of the court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
