Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

VAN SCOTT v. SWARTHOUT, 2:12-cv-1527 MCE KJN P. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20120810a31 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On August 2, 2012, plaintiff filed a document styled, "Motion for Default Judgment." (Dkt. No. 10.) Petitioner claims that respondent failed to answer, and that on July 28, 2012, clerk's default was entered. Petitioner now seeks default judgment based on respondent's alleged failure to timely respond. However, petitioner is mistaken. No entry of default or other entry was made on July 28, 201
More

ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On August 2, 2012, plaintiff filed a document styled, "Motion for Default Judgment." (Dkt. No. 10.) Petitioner claims that respondent failed to answer, and that on July 28, 2012, clerk's default was entered. Petitioner now seeks default judgment based on respondent's alleged failure to timely respond.

However, petitioner is mistaken. No entry of default or other entry was made on July 28, 2012. Moreover, by order filed June 14, 2012, respondent was ordered to file a response within sixty days. Thus, the response is not due until August 13, 2012, and any motion for relief based on respondent's alleged failure to respond is premature. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's August 2, 2012 motion (dkt. no. 10) is denied without prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer