Filed: Sep. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2012
Summary: CORRECTED STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER DENNIS L. BECK, Magistrate Judge. STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for a status conference on Monday, September 24, 2012, at 1:00 p.m. 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the hearing date until Octob
Summary: CORRECTED STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER DENNIS L. BECK, Magistrate Judge. STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for a status conference on Monday, September 24, 2012, at 1:00 p.m. 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the hearing date until Octobe..
More
CORRECTED STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER
DENNIS L. BECK, Magistrate Judge.
STIPULATION
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for a status conference on Monday, September 24, 2012, at 1:00 p.m.
2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the hearing date until October 22, 2012, at 1:00 p.m. and to exclude time between September 24, 2012, and October 22, 2012. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.
3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:
a. Anthony Capozzi, counsel for defendant, is currently in a murder trial and is unavailable to reach a final resolution of this matter with his client.
b. Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny him/her the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
c. The government does not object to the continuance.
d. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
e. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of September 24, 2012, to October 22, 2012, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
