Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. VISCARRA, 1:11-cv-01969-AWI-BAM. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20120921l59 Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2012
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CIVIL CONTEMPT ANTHONY ISHII, Chief District Judge. Upon the petition of BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, including the declaration of Revenue Officer DAVID M. LOPEZ, it is hereby: ORDERED that the respondents, FREDDY VISCARRA and VERONICA VISCARRA, appear before United States Chief District Judge Anthony W. Ishii, in that Judge's courtroom in the United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721,
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CIVIL CONTEMPT

ANTHONY ISHII, Chief District Judge.

Upon the petition of BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, including the declaration of Revenue Officer DAVID M. LOPEZ, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the respondents, FREDDY VISCARRA and VERONICA VISCARRA, appear before United States Chief District Judge Anthony W. Ishii, in that Judge's courtroom in the United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721, on Monday, October 22, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., and that respondents show cause as follows:

1. Why respondents, FREDDY VISCARRA and VERONICA VISCARRA, should not be held in civil contempt of this Court for their failure to comply with the Order filed on February 22, 2012, directing respondents to comply with the I.R.S. Summonses issued on July 12, 2011.

2. Why the respondents should not be incarcerated and ordered to pay a daily fine until they comply with the Order, and ordered to pay a compensatory fine to the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 7 calendar days after the filing of this Order, the respondents shall file and serve a written response to the Petition re: Civil Contempt of Order Filed February 22, 2012. Only those issues brought into controversy by the responsive papers and supported by declaration will be considered at the hearing on this Order, and any uncontested allegation in the Petition Re: Civil Contempt will be considered admitted.

Respondents are hereby notified that a failure to comply with this Order will subject respondents to possible further sanctions for contempt of Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer