U.S. v. GALLO, 2:07-CR-432 EJG. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20130104d80
Visitors: 140
Filed: Nov. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 29, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: RESTITUTION EDWARD J. GARCIA, District Judge. Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, and defendants Joseph Salvatore Gallo, James Martin, and Mario Fellini III, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request this Court to order that no restitution will be ordered in this case. The government has made multiple requests to obtain documentation and an accurate accounting that fairly establishes restit
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: RESTITUTION EDWARD J. GARCIA, District Judge. Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, and defendants Joseph Salvatore Gallo, James Martin, and Mario Fellini III, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request this Court to order that no restitution will be ordered in this case. The government has made multiple requests to obtain documentation and an accurate accounting that fairly establishes restitu..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: RESTITUTION
EDWARD J. GARCIA, District Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, and defendants Joseph Salvatore Gallo, James Martin, and Mario Fellini III, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request this Court to order that no restitution will be ordered in this case.
The government has made multiple requests to obtain documentation and an accurate accounting that fairly establishes restitution from the victims or their successors in interest. The parties agree that a reasonable time has passed to allow compliance with the government's requests and that additional time is unlikely to assist in obtaining the requisite documentation.
Accordingly, the government agrees that it is unable to establish the amount of restitution owed by the defendants in this case.
For the foregoing reasons, the parties request that this matter be dropped from calendar. It is further requested that the Court find that no recitation will be ordered in this case.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Source: Leagle
