Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ARMSTRONG v. MERCED COUNTY, 1:11-CV-01632-LJO-SKO. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130104629 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF DATES SET FORTH IN THE SCHEDULING ORDER SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge. The parties to this action, plaintiff MARTHA ARMSTRONG and KERED ARMSTRONG, a Minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Martha Armstrong, and defendants CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC., MERCED COUNTY, SHERIFF MARK PAZIN, COMMANDER JAMES BUTTREY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. COLLINS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER B. SHAMBAUGH, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RIOS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ABRAMS,
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF DATES SET FORTH IN THE SCHEDULING ORDER

SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.

The parties to this action, plaintiff MARTHA ARMSTRONG and KERED ARMSTRONG, a Minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Martha Armstrong, and defendants CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC., MERCED COUNTY, SHERIFF MARK PAZIN, COMMANDER JAMES BUTTREY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. COLLINS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER B. SHAMBAUGH, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RIOS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ABRAMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SARGENSON, CORRECTIONAL SERGEANT RISTINE (incorrectly named herein as Correctional Sergeant "Resini"), and defendant ROXANNE LONCTOT, R.N., hereby agree and stipulate to the following:

1. That the pre-trial and trial dates set forth in the Scheduling Order of April 9, 2012 be continued for a period of six months. Said dates consist of non-expert and expert discovery deadlines, non-dispositive motion filing deadline, dispositive motion filing deadline, settlement conference, pre-trial conference and trial.

The basis for the Stipulation and Joint Request are as follows:

1. The two heirs of decedent Derek Armstrong, Sr., who are Derek Armstrong, Jr. and Roshawanda Collins, (named herein as nominal defendants) remain unserved. Defendants in this action wish to avoid the potential of having to be deposed twice. This potential exists should these defendants appear in this action after being deposed and be represented by different plaintiff's counsel, who may wish to re-depose said defendants.

Currently, the widow of Derek Armstrong, Sr., Martha Armstrong and Kered Armstrong, son of Derek Armstrong, Sr. are plaintiffs in this action. Under Probate Code §377.60, Derek Armstrong, Jr. and Roshawanda Collins (son and daughter) are entitled to participate in this litigation. Both have not appeared in this lawsuit and, as noted, have been named as "nominal defendants."

2. This request for the continuance of said dates is to allow for additional time to serve Roshawanda Collins, who has still not been located, although a tentative, but unconfirmed address corresponding to a Roshawanda Collins has been found. Derek Armstrong, Jr. has been located and is currently being served with the Summons and Complaint pursuant to CCP §415.40.

The parties have otherwise proceeded, diligently, with case preparation.

1. The parties to this action have been diligent in conducting discovery in the absence of the depositions of defendants. Said discovery has included the exchange of initial disclosures. Plaintiffs have produced extensive medical records, personal records, photographs and other documentation. Defendants Merced County, et al., have produced incident reports and policies.

2. Plaintiff has responded to written discovery requests consisting of interrogatories and further requests for production of documents. The depositions of plaintiffs Martha Armstrong and Kered Armstrong have been taken. The parties have obtained and consulted with experts. Plaintiffs noticed the depositions of three defendants and intend to take the depositions of an additional four to six others.

3. Defendants have requested plaintiff not proceed with the depositions so as to allow further attempts to locate and serve the remaining heirs.

Reasonable, diligent efforts have been performed by plaintiffs' counsel to locate and serve the remaining non-appearing defendants.

1. Accompanying this Stipulation is a declaration of plaintiffs' counsel, detailing the efforts plaintiffs' counsel has undertaken to locate and serve Derek Armstrong, Jr. and Roshawanda Collins. Plaintiffs' counsel submits that these efforts have been diligent and reasonable. One nominal defendant, as noted, has been located and is being served under CCP §415.40. Said heir resides in the State of Washington. The remaining heir is believed to be residing in Springfield, Missouri. An effort is underway to contact this individual to determine whether or not she is the surviving daughter of decedent Derek Armstrong, Sr.

2. A continuance of six months would allow for service by publication to be completed (provided the court grants the order allowing service by publication) and for discovery to be conducted with the additional heirs participating. Should Derek Armstrong, Jr. Decline participation or default on the complaint, a request for entry of default will be filed. Likewise, should Ms. Collins be served and fail to appear, a request for entry of default will be filed.

The parties hereby propose the continued dates as follows:

Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff June 14, 2013 Expert Discovery Cutoff September 23, 2013 Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Reports Due July 15, 2013 Defendants' Expert Witness Reports Due July 31, 2013 Non-Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline October 3. 2013 Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline November 8, 2013 Settlement Conference January 9, 2014 Pre-Trial Conference January 30, 2014 Jury Trial March 10, 2014

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation entered into by and between counsel and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the dates set forth in the Scheduling Order of April 9, 2012, be continued for a period of six (6) months as follows:

Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff June 14, 2013 Expert Discovery Cutoff September 23, 2013 Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Reports Due July 15, 2013 Defendants' Expert Witness Reports Due July 31, 2013 Non-Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline October 3, 2013 Non-Dispositive Motion Hearing Deadline November 6, 2013 Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline November 8, 2013 Dispositive Motion Hearing Deadline December 19, 2013 Settlement Conference January 9, 2014 Pre-Trial Conference January 30, 2014 Jury Trial March 11, 2014

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer