Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY v. REYES, 1:12-cv-01646-AWI-MJS. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130104d52 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION TO DISBURSE INTERPLEADED FUNDS AND DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER ANTONY W. ISHII, District Judge. It is hereby stipulated by and between defendant United States, acting on behalf of its agency the Internal Revenue Service, ("United States") and plaintiff Chicago Title Company ("Chicago"), by and through their undersigned attorneys, as follows: 1. On or about June 28, 2012, Chicago filed its Complaint in Interpleader ("Complaint") in Tulare County Superior Court, Case No. TCL 15403
More

STIPULATION TO DISBURSE INTERPLEADED FUNDS AND DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER

ANTONY W. ISHII, District Judge.

It is hereby stipulated by and between defendant United States, acting on behalf of its agency the Internal Revenue Service, ("United States") and plaintiff Chicago Title Company ("Chicago"), by and through their undersigned attorneys, as follows:

1. On or about June 28, 2012, Chicago filed its Complaint in Interpleader ("Complaint") in Tulare County Superior Court, Case No. TCL 154031, seeking to be discharged from all liability as to undisbursed funds in the amount of $1,525.10 ("Undisbursed Funds") arising from the foreclosure of certain real property located in Tulare County on or about October 21, 2008, and held in escrow without interest. The Complaint named the United States and the owner of the real property, Daniel Reyes, as the only defendants having an interest in the Undisbursed Funds. Chicago disclaimed any interest in the Undisbursed Funds, but seeks costs and attorneys' fees as a result of the interpleader action. The United States removed the Complaint to District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1444.

2. The United States asserts a claim to the Undisbursed Funds based upon a tax lien in the amount of $56,339.70 assessed against the foreclosed property. Daniel Reyes has not filed a response to the Complaint and his interest in the real property was foreclosed. The United States assert that Chicago did not exercise due diligence to contact the IRS regarding the existence of the Undisbursed Funds after the foreclosure on October 21, 2008, and that Chicago should have placed the Undisbursed Funds in an interest bearing account pending resolution. Chicago denies all allegations against it.

3. The parties wish to avoid the expense, risk and uncertainty involved in litigation over the matters raised in the interpleader and instead wish to compromise and settle the claims as it relates to the Undisbursed Funds.

4. The parties agree that Chicago shall waive any claim for attorney's fees and costs in this case from the Undisbursed Funds, and the United States shall receive the entire one thousand five hundred and twenty five dollars and ten cents ($1,525.10) plus any interest which may have accrued since deposit in full satisfaction of all liens and claims to the Undisbursed Funds. Upon disbursement of the funds, the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice.

5. The United States and Chicago each release each other from any and all claims (including unknown claims), demands, causes of action, actions, rights, liabilities, contract obligations, damages, attorney's fees, costs, torts, suits, debts, sums of money, accountings, reckonings, bills, covenants, controversies, agreements, promises whatsoever, at law or in equity or otherwise, whether direct or indirect, known or unknown, which they now hold, or have at any time held, or may in the future hold, against each other, which may be based upon any facts, acts, omissions, conduct, purchases, representations, contracts, agreements, securities, events, causes or matters of any kind occurring or existing at any time on or before the date of this Stipulation which in any way arises from or is related to the Complaint in this case.

6. This stipulation is not, is in no way intended to be, and should not be construed as, an admission of liability or fault on the part of the United States or Chicago, their agents, attorneys, servants, or employees, and it is specifically denied that they are liable to each other. This settlement is entered into by all parties for the purpose of compromising disputed claims to the Unclaimed Funds and avoiding the expenses and risks of further litigation.

7. It is also agreed, by and among the United States and Chicago that the respective parties will each bear their own costs, fees, and expenses and not in addition thereto.

8. The persons signing this stipulation warrant and represent that they possess full authority to bind the persons on whose behalf they are signing to the terms of the settlement. In the event any plaintiff is a minor or a legally incompetent adult, the plaintiffs must obtain Court approval of the settlement at their expense.

9. Payment of the stipulated amount of $1,525.10 to the United States shall be made payable to United States Treasury and sent to the Office of the United States Attorney at the following address:

United States Treasury c/o United States Attorney 2500 Tulare, Ste. 4401 Fresno, California 93721

10. The parties agree that this stipulation, including all the terms and conditions of this compromise settlement and any additional agreements relating thereto, may be made public in their entirety, and the parties expressly consent to such release and disclosure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b).

11. The United States and Chicago expressly waive any rights or benefits available which they may have against each other under or pursuant to section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California, which provides:

A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor.

The parties understand and agree that this Stipulation shall act as a release of future claims that may arise from the dispute in the Action, whether such claims are currently known, unknown, foreseen or unforeseen. The parties understand and acknowledge the significance and consequences of the specific waiver of section 1542 and hereby assume full responsibility for any injury, loss, damage or liability that may be incurred hereafter by reason of or related to the matters raised in the Action.

12. The parties fully understand, accept and assume the risk that the facts on which this Stipulation is executed may later be found to be different from facts now believed to be true, and the parties agree that this Stipulation shall remain effective, notwithstanding any such differences.

13. The United States makes no warranties, representations, promises and/or assurances of any type concerning the federal or state tax consequences, effects and/or implications concerning any of the matters referenced in this Stipulation, including, without limitation, the matters set forth in paragraph 4 above.

14. In consideration of the payment set forth in paragraph 4 above, the parties agree to execute and file with the Court all such documents as shall be necessary to cause the Undisbursed Funds to be paid and the case to be dismissed with prejudice. The parties further agree that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the Stipulation. To the extent any further documents are required to be executed to effectuate this Stipulation, each party agrees to execute and deliver such other and further documents as may be required.

15. Each party declares and represents that no promises, inducements, or other agreements not expressly contained herein have been made; this Stipulation contains the entire agreement between the parties; and the terms of this Stipulation are contractual and not mere recitals.

16. The parties represent that they have thoroughly read, know and understand the contents herein; they have executed this Stipulation voluntarily; they have not been influenced by any person or attorney acting on behalf of any party; and they understand that, after signing this Stipulation, they cannot proceed against any person whom they hereby release.

17. This Stipulation shall inure to the benefit of each party, her/its predecessors, successors, subsidiaries, affiliates, representatives, assigns, agents, officers, directors, employees, claimants pursuant to any applicable wrongful death or survival statute, and personal representatives, past, present or future.

18. It is expressly understood and agreed that this Stipulation may not be altered, amended, modified or otherwise changed in any respect, except by a writing duly executed by the party to be charged, and further that all prior oral understandings, agreements and writings are expressly superseded and are of no further force or effect.

19. This Stipulation may be duly executed by any party on any number of counterparts, all of which taken together shall be construed as one document.

The parties request the Court endorse this stipulation by way of formal order.

Dated: January 3, 2013 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By: /s/Jeffrey J. Lodge JEFFREY J. LODGE Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States Dated: January 3, 2013 HERSHORNIN & HENRY, LLP By: /s/Olivier J. Labarre OLIVIER J. LABARRE, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff Chicago Title Company

ORDER

The stipulation is approved. The Clerk shall pay $1,525.10, plus any interest which may have accrued since deposit with the Court, to the United States from the interpleaded funds as directed above. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the terms of the stipulation set forth above, the complaint is dismissed with prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer