LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.
It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through WILLIAM WONG, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, JUAN ALBERTO DE LA FUENTE by and through his counsel, COURTNEY FEIN, Assistant Federal Defender that the status conference set for Tuesday, March 5, 2013, be continued to Tuesday, April 23, 2013, at 9:15 a.m., for status conference.
The reason for this continuance is that the parties continue to be engaged in settlement discussions, and counsel continues to investigate possible defenses in the event that Mr. De La Fuente elects to proceed to trial. As Mr. De La Fuente is housed in Butte County, counsel will need time to travel to the jail to discuss the case with him.
It is further stipulated that the time period from the date of this stipulation, February 8, 2013, through and including the date of the new status conference, April 23, 2013, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv)and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare].
Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. It is hereby ordered that the presently set March 5, 2013, status conference shall be continued to April 23, 2013, at 9:15 a.m., It is further ordered that the time period from the date of the parties' stipulation, February 8, 2013, through and including the date of the new status conference hearing, April 23, 2013, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare].
Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.