Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MVP ASSET MANAGEMENT (USA) LLC v. VESTBIRK, 2:10-cv-02483-GEB-CMK. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130401682 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 28, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge. 1. WHEREAS, on March 22, 2013 the Court issued an Order dismissing the Fourth Amended Complaint and granting Plaintiff leave to file a Fifth Amended Complaint on or before April 1, 2013; 2. WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Specially Appearing Defendants have agreed to extend by fourteen (14) days Plaintiff's time to file the Fifth Amended Complaint, and that Specially Ap
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

1. WHEREAS, on March 22, 2013 the Court issued an Order dismissing the Fourth Amended Complaint and granting Plaintiff leave to file a Fifth Amended Complaint on or before April 1, 2013;

2. WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Specially Appearing Defendants have agreed to extend by fourteen (14) days Plaintiff's time to file the Fifth Amended Complaint, and that Specially Appearing Defendants in turn will have a fourteen (14) day extension of their time to respond;

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Specially Appearing Defendants, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. That Plaintiff's time to file the Fifth Amended Complaint be extended from April 1, 2013 to April 15, 2013, and that Specially Appearing Defendants in turn will have a fourteen (14) day extension of their time to respond.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Plaintiff is granted until April 15, 2013 to file a Fifth Amended Complaint addressing the deficiencies of Plaintiff's pleading discussed in the order of March 22, 2013 dismissing the Fourth Amended Complaint. Further, Plaintiff is notified that this action may be dismissed with prejudice under Rule 41(b) if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within the prescribed time period. Specially Appearing Defendants have a fourteen (14) day extension of their time to respond to the amended complaint, once filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer